麻豆蜜桃精品无码视频-麻豆蜜臀-麻豆免费视频-麻豆免费网-麻豆免费网站-麻豆破解网站-麻豆人妻-麻豆视频传媒入口

Set as Homepage - Add to Favorites

【how to have cyber sex video】Enter to watch online.Tuna Canyon Coalition Says Petition for Memorial Is a Sham

Source:Global Perspective Monitoring Editor:fashion Time:2025-07-03 16:40:45
An image of the oak grove at the Tuna Canyon site from a video shot by Joe Barrett.

The Tuna Canyon Detention Station Coalition is urging its members and supporters not to sign a petition being circulated online by a group called the Tuna Canyon Memorial Partnership.

The coalition has been working to establish a memorial at the site of the Tuna Canyon Detention Station, a former Civilian Conservation Corps camp in Tujunga that housed local Japanese, German and Italian immigrants rounded up by the government shortly after Pearl Harbor.

All traces of the camp were razed when a golf course was built on the site, but the Los Angeles City Council designated Tuna Canyon a historical and cultural monument, singling out a grove of trees that dates back to the 1940s. The property owner, Snowball West Investments, has opposed the designation because it would interfere with development.

The petition, with no names of individuals or organizations attached, reads, in part: “We believe the Tuna Canyon Detention Center Memorial Exhibit deserves a permanent home. The Tuna Canyon Memorial Partnership proposes to create a permanent detention camp memorial with facilities that can house exhibits, educate the public and promote the role of history in the protection of civil liberties.

“There is a possibility of a land donation from the current property owner to act as a permanent foundation for the proposal. It would be located directly across the street with a clear view of the original site of the camp, 6433 La Tuna Canyon Rd., Tujunga, CA 91042.

“The Tuna Canyon Memorial Partnership will hire an artist and an architect to design a memorial and a permanent facility to house the written and oral histories of detainees and their families. The development would include a commemorative space for contemplation and ceremonial gatherings.”

In a statement issued over the weekend, the TCDSC said: “Please be aware that the Tuna Canyon Detention Station Coalition is NOT connected to, and does NOT support, this petition calling for a Tuna Canyon memorial to be located across the street from the actual site of the detention station in any way, shape, or form.

“This petition is being circulated by someone working for the 229-unit housing project proposed for the historic site and not by any organization that is genuinely working to preserve the history of Tuna Canyon. We are working on plans for an ON-SITE memorial and other public amenities in a regional park that would benefit the community and the City of Los Angeles. We are hoping the owner will discuss selling the land at a fair market price to a public agency for these purposes.

“During the Los Angeles City Council mandated working group in 2013, both the landowner’s representatives and the interested community were represented. They reached a consensus that there would be a publicly accessible memorial on the site where the original detention station was located and that included the grove of oak trees, which existed at the time that the detention station was in operation. The Tuna Canyon Detention Station Coalition supports this decision and believes this is the only appropriate site where a memorial should be located.

“The Tuna Canyon Detention Station Coalition is a nonprofit organization, established in 2013, to preserve the story of Tuna Canyon, and especially of the Japanese, German, and Italian immigrants, Japanese taken from Peru, and others who were held there during World War II. It is the winner of two National Park Service Japanese American Confinement Sites grants, one to tell the story of Tuna Canyon through our traveling museum exhibit, ‘Only the Oaks Remain,’ and the other to preserve the video histories of Tuna Canyon descendants through our ‘The Legacy Project.’

“The Tuna Canyon Detention Station Coalition has also undertaken extensive research on Tuna Canyon at the National Archives in Washington, D.C. and elsewhere.

“We urge you not to sign this misleading ‘Tuna Canyon Memorial Partnership petition’ and we appreciate your continued support to preserve the history of Tuna Canyon at its rightful location.”

The Tuna Canyon Detention Station. (Courtesy of the Little Landers Historical Society)

TCDSC President Nancy Oda said, “With the leadership of the Sunland Tujunga community, Little Landers Historical Society, La Crescenta Volunteers Organized in Saving the Environment, Italian Museum of Los Angeles, Tricentennial Organization, NCRR (Nikkei for Civil Rights & Redress), JACL, Nisei Week Committee, LTHS (Little Tokyo Historical Society) … and many more organizations, we were able to achieve Historical Cultural Monument status …?If we move across the street, we will lose the designation and the grove will make way for 229 houses.”

“This statement refers to ‘the’ Tuna Canyon Detention Center Memorial Exhibit, not to ‘a’ Tuna Canyon Detention Center Memorial Exhibit,” said Russell Endo, TCDSC board member, retired professor of sociology and Asian American studies at University of Colorado, and descendant of a Tuna Canyon detainee. “Words do matter. There is only one existing Tuna Canyon exhibit. This, in particular, is why people will be confused and think we are behind the petition.”

James Okazaki, TCDSC board member, stated, “Trees are living things. They saw everything that happened at Tuna Canyon. The trees across the street are deaf. They cannot hear due to the freeway noise and pollution.”

The Manzanar Committee has also urged its supporters not to sign the petition.

On the Tuna Canyon Memorial Partnership’s Facebook page, which also does not list any members by name, Noel Higa, a Sansei who grew up near the detention center site, posted a series of questions:

“How many of the family of those historically detained here are involved in your effort? How many Japanese Americans are represented in your group? How does this effort differ from the existing Tuna Canyon Detention Station preservation effort? Who are the ‘partners’ in your effort? Why, in light of the existing effort … do you feel it is necessary to advocate for an alternative? Are you a non-profit organization? Are you connected with or supported by the developer of the underlying development?”

As of Tuesday afternoon, there was no response.

0.1689s , 14328.8203125 kb

Copyright © 2025 Powered by 【how to have cyber sex video】Enter to watch online.Tuna Canyon Coalition Says Petition for Memorial Is a Sham,Global Perspective Monitoring  

Sitemap

Top 主站蜘蛛池模板: 欧美乱大 | 国产欧美精品系列在线 | 91九色精品国产自产精品 | 韩国成人网址 | 国产在线视频一区二区 | 国产成人亚洲精品77 | 日韩欧美永久免费aⅴ在线 日韩欧美尤物视频 | 淫午夜 | 亚洲人成人在线 | 国产人人干 | 亚洲三级一区 | 中国成人av网址 | 国产欧美乱夫不卡无乱码 | 国产未成女年一区二区 | 永久免费观看美女裸体网站 | 免费国产亚洲香蕉线 | 国产伦国产伦老熟300部 | 日本中文字幕无线观看日本 | 亚洲天堂欧美 | 亚洲r一二线做vv在线观看 | 中文乱幕日产无线码 | 午夜伦理电影网 | 亚洲久久视频 | 91青娱国产盛 | 亚洲日韩欧美国产精品共 | 亚洲色 综国产 | 国产情侣亚洲 | 国产巨胸爆乳裸体免费视频 | 91天堂在线观看 | 哑洲成人高清黄色片 | 欧美人与动牲交 | 欧美乱xxxxx 欧美乱大交x | 一人成人网战 | 91精品久久久久久久99蜜桃 | 日韩欧美高清久久 | 国产精品偷伦免费视频A片 国产精品凸凹视频 | 国产最变态调教视频大全 | A片视频在线免费观看无码 A片网站美女网站 | 国产日韩欧美高清免费 | 亚洲精品无码一区二区四区 | 不卡日韩av无码国产精品 |