If you took a big sip of coffee on hidden sex videoWednesday and tried to dive down a Wikipedia rabbit hole, you may now have a wet screen, because get this: Wikipedia looks different.
This Tweet is currently unavailable. It might be loading or has been removed.
Perhaps your brain rejected all the new white space, or the way the "sticky" new table of contents hovers while you scroll. But also maybe you just hate change.
This Tweet is currently unavailable. It might be loading or has been removed.
There's no right way to react to a thing happening on the internet, so whining and nitpicking, along with inexplicable fear, are to be expected at a time like this.
However, according to Annie Rauwerda, the Wikipedia editor and superfan behind the Twitter account Depths of Wikipedia, the update, called "Vector 2022," was in the works for a long time, and had been discussed nearly to death before the changes were rolled out. "Wikipedians have spilled more than 200,000 words on the page for Vector 2022 feedback," Rauwerda wrote in Slate. That word count means, she notes, "There’s a corpus longer than Jane Eyre(and almost as long as Moby-Dick) about button positioning and table formatting."
But nothing has fundamentally changed. The links you're used to seeing in a long, exhaustive sidebar on the left — y'know, "Main page," "Contents" "Current events" "Random article," and the rest — are still there. You just have to click the little double carrot icon in the top left corner to bring them back.
This Tweet is currently unavailable. It might be loading or has been removed.
And once you get used to the new maximum line width, users of monitors with high resolutions might appreciate not having to read single lines of text as long as the entire Gettysburg Address.
But according to Rauwerda, the new design has already seen a substantial backlash, and it's only been one day. Swahili-language Wikipedians held a unanimous vote, according to her Slate article, and officially requested that the changes be reverted. And in a wider vote about whether the new version should be the default, true democracy does not appear to be in evidence, since "the 165 people who voted to oppose the redesign outnumbered the 153 supporters."
So if this gets you fired up, and you just need the old Wikipedia back, well, join one of the long, long, discussion threads about that. Or, since this isWikipedia after all, just customize your experience, and leave the Wikipedians to their weirdly aggressive arguments about steam engines.
Wordle today: The answer and hints for January 8, 2025Best Fire TV deal: Save $180 on 55Calm Premium: Save 50% on a premium subscription.When is the Jake Paul vs. Mike Tyson fight on Netflix?Best Apple Pencil deal: Save $10 on Apple Pencil (USBBest Apple Airtag deal: Save $30 on Apple AirtagsBest early Black Friday selfBest Apple Watch deal: Save $70 on Apple Watch 10An influencer was disqualified from the NYC Marathon for bringing a filming crew onto the course'Scram!' TikTok just made it to Taylor Swift's Eras Tour NFTs are bringing back contemporary art sales How to change your Twitter handle and display name Halloween pet costumes at Walmart Tinder brings back Work Mode for daters returning to the office We need to talk about Jason Sudeikis' Twitter likes TikTok's nostalgia Red flags are taking over Twitter 'Check your kids' Halloween candy' memes hilariously mocks hyped drug warnings This *very good* dog stole a cricket ball in the middle of a big match Unpacking a medical meme: How does ibuprofen know where the pain is?
0.1497s , 12226.5 kb
Copyright © 2025 Powered by 【hidden sex video】Enter to watch online.Wikipedia's new look is not popular, but that's to be expected,Global Perspective Monitoring