Facebook is web xem phim sex onlinetrying super hard to refute claims of "anti-conservative bias," reportedly to the extent that it's undermining the company's own efforts to promote truth over lies.
A new investigation from the Washington Postshows how Facebook avoids penalizing certain high-profile conservative users when they spread misinformation. Facebook employees who spoke on the condition of anonymity say that these accounts skirt consequences for breaking rules because Facebook is trying to avoid disciplining conservatives who would raise hell about "anti-conservative bias."
Two such users who receive that special treatment? Donald Trump, Jr., and the pro-Trump super PAC America First Action, among many others.
Facebook's rules state that accounts labeled as "repeat offenders" for spreading misinformation shall receive consequences like the inability to advertise, reduced distribution, and even account bans. However, the Post's analysis found that the PAC does not appear to have received such penalties, despite sharing two pieces of content labeled as false within 90 days (which qualifies them for the "repeat offender" label).
As for Trump, Jr., Facebook removed a false label from the president's eldest son's Instagram account that would have been a second strike, thus making him a repeat offender. It did so specifically to avoid mini-Trump complaining about censorship, according to the sources. Facebook did not deny the latter allegation, saying "we will not apply a penalty in rare cases when the rating was not appropriate or warranted under the program’s established guidelines."
While some conservative pages do face consequences, the Postfound similar hands-off treatment for a number of other conservative pages, including the Gateway Pundit.
Facebook declined to comment to the paper on any specific pages and enforcement actions (or lack thereof). A spokesperson said “We don’t disclose the details of these thresholds publicly for very real concerns about gaming the system, but we do send notifications to groups, pages, accounts and advertisers when they’ve received a strike and are receiving reduced distribution, and when they are a repeat offender."
There is no reputable scientific data establishing that there is any "anti-conservative bias" in the content moderation efforts and distribution on social media. Instead, the claims are the latest iteration of a long-standing Republican tactic: Claiming "bias" in order to "game the refs" into making decisions that go conservatives' way, specifically to avoid such claims of bias.
In the case of Facebook, gaming the refs very much appears to be working.
Topics Facebook Politics
Instagram censors #VaginalCancer hashtag, allows #VaginalSteamingGoogle's Gemini Live may let you talk to it about your uploaded filesLofi jazz videos on TikTok are a massage for my brain2025 dating trends, according to BumbleBest robot vacuum deal: Save $250 on the iRobot 15+Stephen King has reignited his Twitter beef with Ted CruzLego early Black Friday sale: Save up to 49% on Lego setsPrime Day 2 fitness tracker deals: Fitbit, Apple Watch, and moreLofi jazz videos on TikTok are a massage for my brainBest birthday gifts for your wife Apple to Facebook: We're standing up for our users 'Wonder Woman 1984' reviews are in. Here's what critics think of it. Chinese drone company DJI added to U.S. government blacklist FTC launches 'wide Dick Van Dyke, icon of delight, celebrates his 95th birthday Tesla, Lucid, Nikola, and more: EV winners and losers in 2020 Apple closes a bunch of stores yet again because of COVID The UK just took an important step in making blood donation more inclusive Photo apps show you are your own best social media Sesame Street reveals new Rohingya refugee muppets
0.1641s , 8193.578125 kb
Copyright © 2025 Powered by 【web xem phim sex online】Enter to watch online.Facebook content mods reportedly favor Trump, Jr., other conservatives,Global Perspective Monitoring