The Do Clothes Make the Woman?: Gender, Performance Theory and Lesbian EroticismU.S. Senate has unveiled yet another AI protections bill among a series of similar initiatives, this time aimed at safeguarding the work of artists and other creatives.
Introduced as the Content Origin Protection and Integrity from Edited and Deepfaked Media Act (COPIED Act), the new legislation would require more precise authentication of digital content and make the removal or tampering of watermarks illegal, the Vergereported, under new AI standards developed by National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST).
The bill specifically requires generative AI developers to add content provenance information (identification data embedded within digital content, like watermarks) to their outputs, or allow individuals to attach such information themselves. More standardized access to such information may help the detection of synthetic, AI generated content like deepfakes, and curb the use of data and other IP without consent. It would also authorize the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and state attorneys general to enforce the new regulations.
A regulatory pathway such as this could effectively help artists, musicians, and even journalists keep their original works out of the data sets used to train AI models — a growing public accessibility issue that's only been exacerbated by recent collaborations between AI giants like OpenAI and media companies. Organizations like artist union SAG-AFTRA, the Recording Industry Association of America, the News/Media Alliance, and Artist Rights Alliance have come out in favor of the legislation.
"We need a fully transparent and accountable supply chain for generative Artificial Intelligence and the content it creates in order to protect everyone’s basic right to control the use of their face, voice, and persona," said SAG-AFTRA national executive director Duncan Crabtree-Ireland.
Should it pass, the bill would make it easier for such creatives and media owners to set terms for content use, and provide a legal pathway should their work be used without consent or attribution.
Topics Artificial Intelligence Politics Senate
10 Instagram posts that got people talking this weekHere's the FBI director's full statement blasting Hillary Clinton's email practices#AskAntony trends as Australia falls into existential crisisEnjoy breakfast at the 'Harry Potter' studio tour like the wizard you areDog thrown from roof in viral video has been found alive'Ice Cream Books' is your delicious Instagram for summer readingStore immediately regrets asking customer to back up faulty carrot claimSpire smart pebble watches your breathing and mental healthPsychologist analyses Cersei's behaviour in 'Game of Thrones' Season 6These jokes about the Queen's sex life got 100 complaints 1 in 8 men under 35 bring condoms to funerals, Trojan says Twitter will now put Community Notes 'fact checks' on images Twitter is now worth one Wordle today: Here's the answer and hints for May 28 Ke Huy Quan's storyline in 'American Born Chinese' explained Using ChatGPT to write resumes is a dealbreaker for some recruiters 'Barry' Season 4 ending explained: One last Microsoft's Yusuf Mehdi sheds light on the Bing vs Google rivalry Wordle today: Here's the answer and hints for May 27 'Tears of the Kingdom' duplication glitch removed by patch, but there's a workaround