麻豆蜜桃精品无码视频-麻豆蜜臀-麻豆免费视频-麻豆免费网-麻豆免费网站-麻豆破解网站-麻豆人妻-麻豆视频传媒入口

Set as Homepage - Add to Favorites

【nuru sex nassage video】Your political views help determine which science books you buy

Source:Global Perspective Monitoring Editor:fashion Time:2025-07-03 12:41:36

Our political leanings can nuru sex nassage videoinfluence plenty of our day-to-day choices, from the news we read and watch, to the Facebook friends we hide and the Tweets we like. It's no secret that people tend to gravitate toward ideas that reaffirm their worldview.

This filtering doesn't exclusively exist online. Even the paper-and-ink books we buy can reflect our political preferences -- particularly when it comes to books on science.

A new study found that people who buy conservative or liberal political books in the U.S. are equally interested in science books, but they pick works on starkly different topics.

SEE ALSO: Here’s how you create echo chambers on Facebook

Buyers of liberal books tend to prefer books on basic sciences, such as physics and astronomy, while buyers of conservative books prefer applied sciences, such as criminology and geophysics, researchers found in a paper published Monday in Nature Human Behaviour.

Conservative book buyers were also more inclined to buy "peripheral" science books, meaning books that aren't considered mainstream science reading and express more of a political bent.

Credit: Darren McCollester/Getty Images Credit: Justin Sullivan/Getty Images

Take, for instance, Rich Trzupek's How the EPA's Green Tyranny is Stifling America, or Steve Milloy's Green Hell. Peripheral liberal books included Bob Dean's Reckless: The Political Assault on the American Environment and Van Jones' The Green Collar Economy.

To the study's authors, this political split might be the analogue equivalent of a Facebook "echo chamber" that silences opposing views, or an "information bubble" that isolates news consumers from politically inconvenient truths.

"Even if there's a big pool of common ideas, people aren't consuming them evenly," said James Evans, co-author of the study and director of the University of Chicago's Knowledge Lab.

"The likelihood that political liberals and conservatives who are coming to the table to discuss a major problem in society are going to have exposure to the same kind of research, the same facts, is very limited," he said.

Via Giphy

Kelly Garrett, an associate professor at Ohio State University's School of Communications who was not involved with the research, said he disagreed with framing the results as further proof of information bias. Showing that liberals prefer books on basic sciences, or that conservatives tend to pick applied science books, doesn't necessarily mean consumers are willfully ignoring diverse viewpoints, he said.

"It's a really interesting study, but I don't like framing this as an echo chamber or a filter bubble. That's premature," Garrett said.

Mashable Light Speed Want more out-of-this world tech, space and science stories? Sign up for Mashable's weekly Light Speed newsletter. By clicking Sign Me Up, you confirm you are 16+ and agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Thanks for signing up!

Books, books, books

Evans and his colleagues didn't survey actual book buyers. Instead, they studied U.S. purchasing behavior from the world's two biggest online bookstores: Amazon and Barnes & Noble. Neither company released internal sales data, so the researchers analyzed the algorithms that create up to 100 suggestions under the "Customers who bought this item also bought..." section.

The team collected nearly 26.5 million "co-purchase" links among 1.3 million books from Amazon.com. Then they divvied the books into three groups: political, science and non-science.

Mashable ImageCredit: david ramos/Getty Images

Among the 3,500 politically relevant titles, they identified 673 conservative books and 583 liberal books; some 2,300 "indeterminate" books were discarded. Researchers collected similar information from Barnes & Noble's co-purchasing network and found the same patterns.

A book was considered "science" if it was listed under science categories in the Library of Congress and Dewey Decimal classifications. Nearly 429,000 science titles were grouped into over two dozen high-level topics, which were then distilled into four main schools: humanities, physical sciences, life sciences, and social sciences.

Based on the data, they found conservative books were more likely to be co-purchased with books in applied sciences, such as medicine, law, and -- wait for it -- climatology. Yes, people associated with a political party whose leadership denies mainstream climate science are buying quite a few books on the topic.

Via Giphy

For Garrett, this finding undermines the idea of an echo chamber. "An echo chamber suggests that someone who doubts climate science should be trying to stay well clear" of the field, he said.

Liberal books were more likely to be co-purchased with books in basic science disciplines, such as zoology, anthropology and philosophy.

Some science topics were deemed "purple" if they were co-purchased by both the left and right. Perhaps paleontology and veterinary medicine can bridge this nation's political divides?

For Evans, the algorithms that connect buyers of political books to certain types of science books may be the bookstore equivalent of the Facebook News Feed: A digital microphone that amplifies the things you agree with while moving diverse or opposing views to the bottom of the pile.

Original image replaced with Mashable logoOriginal image has been replaced. Credit: Mashable Original image replaced with Mashable logoOriginal image has been replaced. Credit: Mashable

"In the same way your friends online influence the news you read, these recommender engines send books that are like other parts of you," he said.

"And so you end up getting potential feedbacks that are concerning."

Yet despite rising worries that Americans are growing more narrow-minded, other research suggests we might not be living inside our own thought bubbles after all.

Separate studies using Nielsen TV viewership data, the web activity of more than 10,000 Americans over a year, plus the news choices of 10 million Facebook users all indicate we're not shutting ourselves off to disagreeable information. Another paper found the audiences for CNN and Fox News programs aren't completely separate, either.

Still, this study makes one thing clear: Science can't escape politics.


Featured Video For You
10,000 books create a literary river

0.1375s , 14341.5078125 kb

Copyright © 2025 Powered by 【nuru sex nassage video】Your political views help determine which science books you buy,Global Perspective Monitoring  

Sitemap

Top 主站蜘蛛池模板: 国产综合中文一区二区 | 国产狂喷潮视频在线观看 | 免费试看A片 | 国产 亚洲 欧美 34251 | 亚洲日本中文字幕区 | 亚洲熟女一区二区三区 | 插嫩模的粉穴日韩 | 超清AV无码在线观看 | 久久免费看少妇高潮A片麻豆 | 亚洲第一成年 | 亚洲91精品麻豆国产系列在线 | 午夜神器国产 | 午夜日韩视频 | 国产97在线亚洲 | a级国产乱理伦片在线观 | 国产醉酒迷奷系列在线 | 国产东北露脸对白 | 国产区一区二区学生妹 | 偷拍二区 | 婷婷激情久久丁香综合伊人 | 成人AV一区二区三区无码电影 | 国产最新中文字幕 | 2025AV在线播放 | 专区一区二区在线播放 | 日本xxxxx视频免费看 | 亚洲国产日韩欧美久久精品 | 欧美日本一区 | 熟女人妇成熟妇女系列视频 | 国产极品视频一区二区三区 | 岛国在线视频 | av网站址| 精人妻无码一区二区三区彩美旬果 | 国产成a人亚洲精v品无码 | 日韩一区二区三区影片 | 二次无极品粉嫩虎白女流水 | 亚洲国产精品第一区二区 | 国产精品91网站 | 99久久精品国产一区二区 | 在线丝袜亚洲日韩制服 | 无码中文| 国产精品免费露脸视频 |