【video sex hentai stram】Enter to watch online.Twitter tests feature that limits who can respond to tweets

Twitter is video sex hentai stramtesting a new feature that could fundamentally change the nature of the platform.

On Wednesday, Twitter announced that it would test new controls that would allow a user to select, tweet by tweet, who could respond to their post.

Who's invited to your party? Credit: Twitter

With a new permissions button that appears in the bottom left corner of a tweet, users will be able to choose whether they want any Joe Schmo to be able to reply (currently the norm, and the default going forward), whether "people you follow" can reply, or whether "only people you mention" can weigh in.

A "small" percentage of users have received the test, and Twitter didn't say whether it will be rolling out more widely in the future.

This Tweet is currently unavailable. It might be loading or has been removed.

For the past few years, Twitter has been studying and testing various ways to improve "conversational health" on the platform. That's a fancy term for cutting down on trolling.

Mashable Light Speed Want more out-of-this world tech, space and science stories? Sign up for Mashable's weekly Light Speed newsletter. By clicking Sign Me Up, you confirm you are 16+ and agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Thanks for signing up!

Twitter doesn't explicitly connect the test to that initiative. But in a blog post announcing the feature, it says that "we're exploring how we can improve these settings to give people more opportunities to weigh in while still giving people control over the conversations they start." The blog post references "reply guys" when it explains that "unwanted replies make it hard to have meaningful conversations."

If a person does come across a tweet they're not allowed to respond to, the reply button will be grayed out. If a person tries to reply, a pop-up will explain what's going on.

You're not invited. Credit: twitter

Being a place where anyone can weigh in on any conversation (unless your account is private) is a double-edged sword. It can lead to connections and creativity, and so many funny memes. But it also has enabled harassment and toxicity.

Twitter users might be upset about the power this gives "blue check marks" (people with verified accounts) to make conversations closed and elitist, especially if they use that "people I'm following" setting. Some users, like Lil Nas X, are already joking about their exclusive tweets.

This Tweet is currently unavailable. It might be loading or has been removed.

This Tweet is currently unavailable. It might be loading or has been removed.

Jokes aside, the settings could also be a useful way to facilitate conversations with experts, or free tweeters to share opinions with less fear. Plus, the "everyone" reply setting is still the default, and anyone can still "Retweet with comment." Twitter just made it easier to follow "retweets with comments," too.

The move to rein in a nasty reply thread is not totally unprecedented. In November 2019, Twitter gave users the ability to hide replies to their tweets from specific users.

There is a lot to test with the new feature. Will it change Twitter too much? If so, how angry will people get? And will Twitter roll it out to everyone?That's up to Dorsey and co. to decide.

Topics Social Media X/Twitter

• fashion
• focus
• hotspot
• relaxation
• knowledge
• explore
• synthesize
• recreation

• 10 Members of 2018 JA Leadership Delegation to Japan Announced
• Don’t Let Them Win
• 'USS Callister: Into Infinity' ending explained: What happens to the crew?
• The Vital Possibility of Abdul El-Sayed
• Nisei Week Smiles
• Fresh Hell
• Google releases Pixel Watch 3 Loss of Pulse Detection
• No Country of Civil Men
• California JA Among Albany’s “40 Under 40”
• Best Samsung The Frame TV deal: Save $500 on the 65

• Instagram reportedly told to double number of ads by Facebook
• Obamas reveal their carefully curated 44
• Rivian electric truck is the ultimate camping accessory in new video
• Facebook emails shed light on early days of Cambridge Analytica scandal
• 5 tweets for Black Women's Equal Pay Day that will inspire you to fight for equality
• Why Twitter took action against parody Trump account @RealPressSecBot
• Netflix makes it easier to find new and upcoming movies and shows
• Former Google and Uber exec faces up to 10 years in jail over self
• Twitter's Trust and Safety Council feels ignored if you can believe it
• Tom Holland assures fans he isn't going to stop being Spider

• Kizuna Announces Nitahara as Its Executive Director
• Best travel deal: Score the Frontier Go Wild! summer pass for just $399
• I’ll Be Watching You
• The Tagorean Impulse
• Rep. Chu Shares Thoughts on Midterm Elections
• 'USS Callister: Into Infinity' ending explained: What happens to the crew?
• Et tu, Boris?
• Best Beats deal: Save $70 on the Studio Buds + at Amazon
• Brown Appoints Carin Fujisaki as Associate Justice on Court of Appeal
• 'USS Callister: Into Infinity' ending explained: What happens to the crew?

• Obon Celebrations in Reedley, Sebastopol, Seaside, Sacramento
• Heart in a Black Box
• Google reveals Reddit Answers is powered by Gemini AI
• The Google Pixel 9a is now available — shop at Google, AT&T, more
• ‘Nihonmachi: The Place to Be’ Performance Benefits Koban
• Best Apple Pencil deal: Save $20 on the Apple Pencil (2nd Gen)
• Between Oligarchy and Democracy
• NYT mini crossword answers for April 11, 2025
• New Clothing Line from Designer with Little Tokyo Roots
• What's new to streaming this week? (April 11, 2025)