Trump was basically Obama's reply guy throughout the 2010s,daisy gomez sex videos so it's only fitting that he won't be able to take advantage of a new Twitter feature intended to curb his own comment trolls...legally, at least.
Twitter is testing an ability that lets users limit who can reply to their tweets. If you're part of the test, you'll be able to determine whether everyone can reply (the norm and current default), if only people that you follow can reply, or if only people you tag in a tweet can reply. If you don't tag anyone and go with that last option, you're basically turning off all replies, period.
This Tweet is currently unavailable. It might be loading or has been removed.
Reactions to the new feature have been mixed. Some people are praising it as a way to stop potential harassers from replying. Others are joking about the feature's elitism. And of course, still more have turned the "no replies" tweet into a meme already.
One important take points out the constitutional and legal ramifications of the feature for public officials. The ACLU has issued a statement that public officials need to be careful about how they use the reply-limiting features, lest they violate the First Amendment.
As a general matter, Twitter’s investment in user controls is a good thing. But public officials would be violating the First Amendment if they were to use this tool to block speakers on any accounts they’ve opened up for public conversation in their roles as government actors. Nor should public officials use this tool to decide who can, or can't, reply to accounts they have opened up for requests for government assistance, which may be on the rise due to COVID-19.
For the past several years, courts have been grappling with whether a public figure blocking someone on Twitter constitutes a violation of their first amendment rights. Most notably, the Court of Appeals upheld a ruling in a lawsuit brought against President Trump, saying that he was not allowed to block people after they had offended or disagreed with him, because it impinged on their freedom to engage in political speech.
The ACLU apparently sees the "no replies" feature as an extension of the idea of blocking because it limits speech in what has effectively become a digital public square. So, the new test features might be valuable, but people in the public eye are going to have to be careful about how they use them.
Topics Social Media X/Twitter Politics
Nick Jonas and Priyanka Chopra's engagement has ended meDid the White House delete a key question from Trump's press conference with Putin?Donald Trump lashed out at LeBron James and Don Lemon on TwitterSpotify bans some Alex Jones episodes, but some say it's not enough10 great dog movies from the 1990s7 reasons why you should absolutely take your hardThe White House can't even spell the United States properly7 reasons why you should absolutely take your hardThis photo of Melania Trump gardening is Twitter's new favorite memeJouelzy is here to talk — and whether you're a #SmartBrownGirl or not, you should listen A weird bug can mess up your iPhone's WiFi, but there's a fix Volvo's first electric Just 10 new books you'll probably love 25 ethereal astronomy photos that literally light up the skies 15 timeless tweets to celebrate Twitter's 15th anniversary Disappearing WhatsApp messages roll out to iOS beta users Google Pixel 6 XL's camera will be really powerful, new leak shows Resident Evil flounders on Netflix in a half Ashton Kutcher says he sold his ticket to space Lyft brings back shared rides for first time since pandemic began
0.15s , 14336.8515625 kb
Copyright © 2025 Powered by 【daisy gomez sex videos】Enter to watch online.ACLU warns that 'no replies' on Twitter could violate the constitution,Global Perspective Monitoring