It's June again,what kind of dogs were in the sex therapy video which means it's that time of year when Facebook sticks a rainbow on several of its features in celebration of Pride. This year, to the delight of many, the company went so far as to create a rainbow Pride reaction to join in with the hahas, wows, and other well-known digital icons.
Slightly less delightful was the realization that the rainbow reaction is suspiciously absent from the profiles of some users who just so happen to live in countries that oppress members of the LGBTQ community.
SEE ALSO: Facebook's new Pride Month features celebrate the LGBTQ community with styleThis, perhaps unsurprisingly, led to speculation that in limiting the Pride reaction, the company was deferring to repressive regimes.
This Tweet is currently unavailable. It might be loading or has been removed.
And for sure, it's not a good look for the social media giant. But is failing to roll out the pride reaction in countries like Singapore and Malaysia an intentional nod to those regimes' anti-LGBTQ policies, or just a really bad oversight on Facebook's part?
When Facebook first announced the rainbow reaction on June 5, the company was clear that it would not be available to all users. Facebook VP Alex Schultz chalked this up to the fact that the company is "testing" the feature, although he did not specify the point of the test.
"People in major markets with Pride celebrations will be able to use a temporary rainbow reaction during Pride month," Schultz explained in a blog post. "You can also like this page to access the reaction, however, because this is a new experience we’ve been testing, the rainbow reaction will not be available everywhere."
We reached out to Facebook to get to the bottom of what at the very least appears to be a rather questionable decision, as well as to determine just what exactly the company is testing, but received no response as of press time.
So, what's the deal here? Unfortunately, with Facebook staying mum, it's hard to know for sure. However, in the absence of an official explanation, people are left to guess as to what Facebook's motives truly are. And, frankly, it doesn't look so good.
After all, there's nothing quite like taking a bold corporate stance for equal rights while simultaneously not doing so.
Trump Backs Down from Adding 2020 Census Citizenship QuestionGo For Broke Exhibit Highlights JA Women in MilitaryA Special Day in Arroyo GrandeMonrovia Honoring Japanese American Legacy‘JA Stories of PostProminent Speakers at VJAMM CommemorationManzanar Committee Calls on JACL to Apologize to Tule Lake Resisters60 Years in the SkiesA Portrait of PatriotismChu Amendment to Border Bill Would Prevent Kids from Being Held at Fort Sill Largest cross 10th Northern California Soy and Tofu Festival Returns to S.F. Japantown Saturday Taiwan media group reiterates stand on one China ‘Get Back’ Series Dispels Some Beatle Myths, Including Yoko Ono’s Role in Breakup Mainland condemns Taiwan's probe into pro 'I Was a Simple Man' Now Playing at Royal in Santa Monica Biden to Award Medal of Honor to Soldiers Who Fought in Vietnam City of Orinda Recognizes 80th Anniversary of E.O. 9066 Taiwan voices dissatisfaction with Lai’s governance Mainland spokesperson slams Taiwan leader's defamatory remarks
0.1708s , 14343.3125 kb
Copyright © 2025 Powered by 【what kind of dogs were in the sex therapy video】Enter to watch online.Facebook has a rainbow Pride reaction, but not everyone gets to use it,Global Perspective Monitoring