We all knew facial-recognition technology was flawed,japanese sex video family stroke just perhaps not this flawed.
A new study from the National Institute of Standards and Technology, published on Dec. 19, lays out in painstaking detail how facial-recognition tech misidentifies the elderly, young, women, and people of color at rates higher than that of white men. In other words, more at risk populations are also the ones more likely to suffer false matches and any associated legal troubles that follow.
Just how bad is it? Let's let the NIST study authors explain.
"We found false positives to be higher in women than men, and this is consistent across algorithms and datasets," they wrote. "We found elevated false positives in the elderly and in children; the effects were larger in the oldest and youngest, and smallest in middle-aged adults."
And that's not all. "With mugshot images," the authors continued, "the highest false positives are in American Indians, with elevated rates in African American and Asian populations."
Why does this matter? Well, law enforcement uses the technology, and as such false positives can lead directly to mistaken arrests and harassment.
This study, which claims "empirical evidence" for its findings, is sure to add support to lawmakers' calls to ban the controversial tech.
"We have started to sound the alarm on the way facial recognition technology is expanding in concerning [ways]," wrote congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez in July. "From the FBI to ICE to Amazon, the bar for consent and civil liberties protection is repeatedly violated, and on top of it all has a disproportionate racial impact, too."
She now has additional evidence to back up that latter claim.
SEE ALSO: Here's why San Francisco's vote to ban facial-recognition tech mattersImportantly, the congresswoman isn't alone in her concern. In a statement published by the Washington Post, Senator Ron Wyden reacted to the NIST findings by stating that "algorithms often carry all the biases and failures of human employees, but with even less judgment."
A growing number of cities, including San Francisco and Berkeley, recently moved to ban some government use of the tech. Perhaps this study will encourage others to follow suit.
Topics Facial Recognition
Tsujihara to Step Down as Warner Bros. Chairman and CEOSt. Patrick’s Day at MaryknollTokyo City Cup, Japan Family Day to Be Held as Scheduled SundayWest Covina Cherry Blossom Festival This Saturday‘Okko’s Inn’: A NonScott Sakamoto Honored for ‘A Star Is Born’‘Legend of the Demon Cat’ at Downtown Independent‘Sip and Savor’ at Sake DojoScreening of Short Film ‘In Plain Sight’Cherry Blossom Festival at Shoseian Tea House/Friendship Garden Facebook users can now archive or trash old posts in bulk The Moto G Fast and Moto E are Motorola's new budget Android phones 'The Help' becomes the most watched movie on Netflix Avatar creators need to be improved in video games. Here's why. Someone paid $2.6 million in fees to move $134 worth of crypto and oops 12 excellent podcasts with black hosts for pop culture, politics, or history fans Tesla copycats are suddenly all about online ordering Feminine design is the next frontier of gender Trump admin strips away healthcare protections for transgender people John Oliver's deep dive into the police is as grim as it is eye
0.1464s , 14336.8125 kb
Copyright © 2025 Powered by 【japanese sex video family stroke】Enter to watch online.Federal study confirms facial recognition is a biased mess,Global Perspective Monitoring