麻豆蜜桃精品无码视频-麻豆蜜臀-麻豆免费视频-麻豆免费网-麻豆免费网站-麻豆破解网站-麻豆人妻-麻豆视频传媒入口

Set as Homepage - Add to Favorites

【jenny for fun sex video】Enter to watch online.NFT owners insist they're totally not owned by 'right

Source:Global Perspective Monitoring Editor:recreation Time:2025-07-03 16:14:02

It's cool. No,jenny for fun sex video seriously, it's totally cool.

As non-fungible tokens (NFTs) continue to sell for tens if not hundreds of thousands of dollars in cryptocurrency, those passionate about the digital tokens would very much like critics to know one thing: the scores of trolls copy-pasting their pricey JPEGs are only helping their cause. Or, so the extremely annoyed NFT owners insist.

It's a scene that plays out daily across Twitter, as the members of breakout NFT communities like CryptoPunks and the Bored Ape Yacht Club share their latest scores — along with the mind-boggling prices paid — only to immediately be ridiculed by right-click savers swarming their mentions.

The term, as you might expect, refers to the ability of anyone to right-click and save a public image associated with an NFT. For the unfamiliar, when it comes to artwork, an NFT is often not the art itself, but rather, as one expert put it, like "directions to the museum" where the art is being held.

Here's how the latest crypto culture battle typically plays out: As soon as someone announces a particularly pricey NFT purchase, the right-click savers pounce — tweeting the copied CryptoPunk or Ape back at its proud owner.

After one NFT enthusiast, RookieXBT, claimed to have purchased CryptoPunk 3794 for $157,069 (a sale price confirmed by CryptoPunks' creator Larva Labs), the right-click savers wasted no time in doing their thing.

"Cool, I got mine for free," replied one along with an image of the CryptoPunk in question.

"What do you think of my punk," asked another.

"I just screen shotted this," replied yet another.

Some even screenshot the act of right-click saving to add perceived insult to injury.

"stop stealing other peoples property," came the plaintive reply.

This wasn't even the first time RookieXBT has been right-click saved.

"bro this is so dumb, people are stealing my punk that i paid $225k for and using it as their profile picture," wrote the CryptoPunk owner on July 31. "how is this legal"

Mashable Light Speed Want more out-of-this world tech, space and science stories? Sign up for Mashable's weekly Light Speed newsletter. By clicking Sign Me Up, you confirm you are 16+ and agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Thanks for signing up!

Predictably, the CryptoPunk in question was immediately right-click saved and tweeted back at RookieXBT.

We reached out to confirm that RookieXBT does in fact own the CryptoPunks in question, but received no immediate response. However, as of the time of this writing, the same account owns several CryptoPunks, which RookieXBT has tweeted about purchasing.

Arguments about copy-pasted NFTs pop up all over Twitter. In one such instance, a self-described "NFT Investor" takes another Twitter account to task for supposedly right-click saving their Bored Ape Yacht Club (BAYC) NFT and using it as an avatar.

"I am asking you to change your profile picture as I own the IP and paid 50 Eth for it," reads the request from CapetainTrippy. 50 Eth, incidentally, is about $150,000. "I understand you may be new and would love to have you in #bayc but you need to use a different ape."

Mashable ImageOwning that IP, or something. Credit: screenshot / twitter

"literally right click save as lol," came an immediate reply.

While RookieXBT and CapetainTrippy may be openly stressed about getting right-click saved, other NFT fans want the world to know that the right-click savers are actually owning themselves.

"When you save the image and use it / share it you are making the underlying token more valuable," wrote one. "Kinda ironic how the right click save crowd is actually doing free marketing for nft holders"

This line of thinking, that right-click saving represents a fundamental misunderstanding of NFTs and is itself to be mocked, is pervasive among the diehard NFT crew.

"saying u stole my nft bc u right click saved it is the same as saying u stole my eth balance bc u right clicked saved the number," argued one.

"NO YOU CAN'T SELL AN NFT FOR $69.34M I CAN JUST RIGHT CLICK AND DOWNLOAD IT WHYYYYYYYYYYY," joked the former lead maintainer of the cryptocurrency Monero, and Yat cofounder, Riccardo Spagni.

"Ngl, I kinda enjoy getting right-click-saved," read one NFT fan playing it cool.

So who's right? The NFT owners spending, and sometimes making, untold riches as they buy and sell digital tokens referencing supposedly rare JPEGs? Or the scores of critics sitting on the sidelines, right-click saving while shaking their heads at people who they believe clearly have too much money?

In some ways, both groups are.

NFTs are separate from whatever art they represent. Most often, they're an Ethereum token consisting of metadata describing the artwork in question. Although, there are some cases where the NFT also actually contains the art. As of Aug. 18, CryptoPunks just so happens to be an example of the latter. Larva Labs announced that, as of Wednesday, the 24-by-24 pixel CryptoPunk artwork is now stored on the blockchain.

It's true that owning an NFT does grant the ability to do things that right-click saving an image doesn't (questions of copyright transfer remain complex). But as those things involve cryptographically proving ownership of the NFT along with the ability to sell it, it's all a bit circular.

Either way, as the NFT crowd correctly argues, right-clicking saving a JPEG tied to an NFT doesn't mean you now own the associated NFT.

SEE ALSO: Say hello to Yats: Why investors are paying thousands to 'own' emoji

At the same time, however, the right-click save crowd has successfully highlighted what is perhaps the core reason NFTs have, at least as of yet, struggled to go mainstream: many people consider the idea behind NFTs to be a big dumb joke.

And if the internet loves anything more than owning those it views as dumb, it's debating who is, in fact, getting owned.

Topics Cryptocurrency

0.21s , 12253.9296875 kb

Copyright © 2025 Powered by 【jenny for fun sex video】Enter to watch online.NFT owners insist they're totally not owned by 'right,Global Perspective Monitoring  

Sitemap

Top 主站蜘蛛池模板: AV夜夜操 | 国产精品美女一 | 久久福利视频免费 | 亚洲国产剧情在线观看 | 日本看片视频区一区二 | 国产免费播放一区二区 | 毛片202,5 | 精品91大神在线观看 | 国产熟女露脸 | 性免费看中国学生妹一级大片 | 尤物视频不卡在线观看 | 麻豆视频在线免费看 | 乱伦高清中文综合 | 精品国产免费无码久久久密月 | 少妇私密会所按摩到高潮呻吟 | 97人妻人人做人碰人人爽免费下载 | 亚洲精品无码mv在线观看网站 | 国产精品女主播主要 | 国产精品日产欧美一区二区三区 | 国产精品一区二区不卡小说 | 免费影视资源在线观看 | 国产成人精品免高潮在线观看 | 中文午夜乱理片无码av | 成人叫床语音 | 三男玩一女三A片 | 无码专高清视频点播在看 | 欧美日韩国产码高清综 | 精品久久久无码人妻中文字幕 | 国产亚洲日韩欧美 | 亚洲精品a| 97国内精品久久久久不卡影视 | 三级在线观看视频a毛 | 亚洲精品成人网 | 久久99久久成人 | 九月婷婷人人澡人人 | 日韩激情五码视频中文字幕 | 91视频下载安装 | 91卫星地图手机版下载 | A片无线看 | 人人操97 | 激情久久久久久久久 |